Header Image

Swiss Supreme Court on "surprise" jurisprudence and its application to foreign-represented parties and in sports arbitration

27 August 2014

Authors: Philippe Bärtsch, James Menz

In a German-language decision dated 26 May 2014 and published on 24 June 2014, the Swiss Supreme Court reiterated its right-to-be-heard jurisprudence, holding that a party's rights are not violated where the tribunal applies a Swiss rule of law that was not explicitly argued by the parties but which the parties should reasonably expect to be relevant. The court also rejected the petitioner's argument that a more exacting standard should apply in the context of sports arbitration or where the arbitration involves foreign parties represented by foreign counsel. (Decision 4A_544/2013.)

Download PDF
Published in Practical Law Arbitration

Back to overview


Elliott Geisinger
Elliott Geisinger

Nathalie Voser
Nathalie Voser

Show team

Our International Arbitration Group

Drawing on an outstanding combination of skills and resources, Schellenberg Wittmer’s GAR30 recognized Inter-national Arbitration Group provides representation at the highest level in a broad range of complex international arbitration matters, from critical pre-arbitration injunctions to effective enforcement strategies.

For more information:

Visit Practice Area Site
Download Factsheet