Header Image

Violation of parties’ agreement on constitution of arbitral tribunal can be ground for challenge

24 January 2014

Authors: Nathalie Voser, Aileen Truttmann

In a French-language decision dated 13 November 2013, published on 13 December 2013, the Swiss Supreme Court clarified that the appointment of a sole arbitrator in violation of the parties' agreement to submit their dispute to a three-member panel constituted a ground to challenge the award.

However, it rejected an application to set aside the award because the respondent and his counsel, respectively, had implicitly agreed to the appointment of a sole arbitrator by their conduct. The Supreme Court reaffirmed the well-established principle that the parties have to object in time, failing which they can be barred from relying on the ground of improper constitution of the arbitral tribunal in a petition to set aside the award. (Decision 4A_282/2013.)

Download PDF
Published in Practical Law Arbitration

Back to overview


Elliott Geisinger
Elliott Geisinger

Nathalie Voser
Nathalie Voser

Show team

Our International Arbitration Group

Drawing on an outstanding combination of skills and resources, Schellenberg Wittmer’s GAR30 recognized Inter-national Arbitration Group provides representation at the highest level in a broad range of complex international arbitration matters, from critical pre-arbitration injunctions to effective enforcement strategies.

For more information:

Visit Practice Area Site
Download Factsheet